Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Fresno

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Fresno Adults who Smoke

8.8%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (6.1%), Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (8.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Fresno Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

2.1%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (3.3%), Fresno has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (2.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.5%).
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Fresno Adults Who Are Obese

40.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 40.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (28.8%), Fresno has a value of 40.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Fresno has a value of 40.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (40.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Adults who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
75.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 75.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (62.3%), Fresno has a value of 75.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(62.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (67.7%), Fresno has a value of 75.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(67.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (75.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.5%).
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Children who are Overweight for Age

Current Value:
17.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (13.9%), Fresno has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (17.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
43.9%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (31.2%), Fresno has a value of 43.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (43.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.8%).
Prior Value
(21.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

83.2%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 83.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (85.0%), Fresno has a value of 83.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(85.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (83.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Child and Teen Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

92.0%
(2011-2012)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (94.0%), Fresno has a value of 92.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Fresno Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:
14.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 14.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.3%), Fresno has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Fresno has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.4%).
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Fresno Insufficient Sleep

32.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (31.1%), Fresno has a value of 32.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(31.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Fresno has a value of 32.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (32.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Fresno Older Adult Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

77.0%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 77.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (73.4%), Fresno has a value of 77.0% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(73.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (77.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (63.2%).
Prior Value
(63.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
12.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 12.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 12.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Fresno has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Fresno Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

84.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 84.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.0%), Fresno has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (84.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.2%).
Prior Value
(86.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 21.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Fresno has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Fresno

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Voter Engagement

Current Value:

County: Fresno Voter Engagement

51.8%
Percent of adults
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 51.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (66.2%), Fresno has a value of 51.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(66.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (51.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (59.8%).
Prior Value
(59.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
74.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 74.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (80.7%), Fresno has a value of 74.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (74.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (66.7%).
Prior Value
(66.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Fresno

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Adult Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Fresno Adult Arrest Rate

30.9
Arrests per 1,000 population 18+
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 30.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (25.1), Fresno has a value of 30.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(25.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (30.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.0).
Prior Value
(34.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
8.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 8.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 8.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.1), Fresno has a value of 8.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Fresno has a value of 8.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (8.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.5).
Prior Value
(7.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Fresno Deaths in Custody

Current Value:

County: Fresno Deaths in Custody

0.4
Per 10,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Fresno has a value of 0.4 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (0.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4).
Prior Value
(0.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Hate Crime Offenses

Current Value:

County: Fresno Hate Crime Offenses

26
Offenses
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (26) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23).
Prior Value
(23)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Juvenile Arrest Rate

Current Value:

County: Fresno Juvenile Arrest Rate

3.9
Arrests per 1,000 population aged 0-17
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 3.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (2.8), Fresno has a value of 3.9 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (3.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.5).
Prior Value
(2.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Fresno Violent Crime Rate

721.6
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 721.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 449.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 621.3.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (493.1), Fresno has a value of 721.6 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(493.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (380.7), Fresno has a value of 721.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(380.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Federal Bureau of Investigation
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (721.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (730.5).
Prior Value
(730.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Fresno Average Household Size

3.10
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (2.90), Fresno has a value of 3.10.
CA Value
(2.90)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Fresno has a value of 3.10.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Fresno Foreign Born Persons

19.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (26.5%), Fresno has a value of 19.9%.
CA Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Fresno has a value of 19.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:
125,708
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Residential Segregation - Black/White

Current Value:
45.9
Score
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 45.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 45.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 60.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,076 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (58.0), Fresno has a value of 45.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(58.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (62.7), Fresno has a value of 45.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(62.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (45.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (49.0).
Prior Value
(49.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Fresno Veteran Population

4.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (4.7%), Fresno has a value of 4.8%.
CA Value
(4.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Fresno has a value of 4.8%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

18.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 18.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7), Fresno has a value of 18.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Fresno has a value of 18.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (18.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4).
Prior Value
(16.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

County: Fresno Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
28.4%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 28.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 28.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (26.7%), Fresno has a value of 28.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Fresno has a value of 28.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (28.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

Current Value:
0.2
Collisions per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 0.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
CA Counties
(2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Fresno has a value of 0.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (0.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.6).
Prior Value
(13.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 27.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 27.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.4%), Fresno has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Fresno has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Fresno People 65+ Living Alone

24.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 24.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (22.0%), Fresno has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Fresno has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
30,217
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Fresno Social Associations

5.2
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 5.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.6.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 5.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (6.0), Fresno has a value of 5.2 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(6.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Fresno has a value of 5.2 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (5.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.2).
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:
7.7
Cases per 1,000 children
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (6.1), Fresno has a value of 7.7 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.2), Fresno has a value of 7.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (7.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8).
Prior Value
(8.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

County: Fresno

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Fresno Mean Travel Time to Work

23.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Fresno has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Fresno has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
25.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 25.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.6%), Fresno has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(41.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Fresno has a value of 25.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (25.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.6%).
Prior Value
(25.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Fresno has a value of 0.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Fresno has a value of 0.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Fresno Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
75.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 75.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 75.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Fresno has a value of 75.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Fresno has a value of 75.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

County: Fresno Workers who Walk to Work

1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 1.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 1.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Fresno has a value of 1.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Fresno has a value of 1.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Fresno Employer Establishments

18,199
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (18,199) is greater  than the previously measured value (17,653).
Prior Value
(17,653)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
55.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 55.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 55.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (57.8%), Fresno has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Fresno has a value of 55.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
55.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 55.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 55.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (59.3%), Fresno has a value of 55.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(59.3%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Fresno has a value of 55.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Fresno Size of Labor Force

464,652
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (464,652) is greater and better than the previously measured value (461,401).
Prior Value
(461,401)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Fresno Total Employment

276,218
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (276,218) is less  than the previously measured value (284,131).
Prior Value
(284,131)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Fresno Total Employment Change

-2.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of -2.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -4.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -6.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of -2.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (-5.6%), Fresno has a value of -2.8% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(-5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Fresno has a value of -2.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (-2.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
8.8%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (5.7%), Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Fresno has a value of 8.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (8.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Adults Receiving Food Stamp Benefits

Current Value:
34.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 34.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 34.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.7%), Fresno has a value of 34.7% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(31.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (34.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (31.6%).
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (13.5%), Fresno has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Fresno has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (19.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.0%).
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Food Insecure Children Likely Ineligible for Assistance

26%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 26% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 26% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,134 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (34%), Fresno has a value of 26% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(34%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (25%), Fresno has a value of 26% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (26%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (20%).
Prior Value
(20%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Fresno Food Insecurity Rate

13.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 13.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 13.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (10.5%), Fresno has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Fresno has a value of 13.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (13.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
62.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (53.1%), Fresno has a value of 62.4%.
CA Value
(53.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Fresno has a value of 62.4%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
38,121
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 23.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 23.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (16.8%), Fresno has a value of 23.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(16.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (23.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.4%).
Prior Value
(32.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
15.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 15.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 15.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Fresno has a value of 15.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (15.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.6%).
Prior Value
(20.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
61.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 61.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 51.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 61.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 61.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (52.6%), Fresno has a value of 61.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(52.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Fresno has a value of 61.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (61.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (62.1%).
Prior Value
(62.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Economy / Homelessness

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Economy / Homelessness

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Point-in-Time Count of Unaccompanied Youth Under 25 Experiencing Homelessness

105
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (105) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42).
Prior Value
(42)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Point-in-Time Count of Veterans Experiencing Homelessness

205
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (205) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (93).
Prior Value
(93)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Sheltered Homeless

Current Value:

County: Fresno Sheltered Homeless

1,878
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (1,878) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (999).
Prior Value
(999)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Total Homeless Population

Current Value:

County: Fresno Total Homeless Population

4,216
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (4,216) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (999).
Prior Value
(999)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Unsheltered Homeless

Current Value:

County: Fresno Unsheltered Homeless

2,338
Persons
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (2,338) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Fresno Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.9%), Fresno has a value of 1.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(0.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Fresno has a value of 1.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Fresno Homeownership

50.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 50.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 50.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Fresno has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Fresno has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,207
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of $1,207 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,289 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,919.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($1,856), Fresno has a value of $1,207 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($1,856)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Fresno has a value of $1,207 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$591
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of $591 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $652 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $773.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($732), Fresno has a value of $591 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($732)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Fresno has a value of $591 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$1,897
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of $1,897 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $2,128 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $2,724.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 54 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value ($2,759), Fresno has a value of $1,897 which is lower and better.
CA Value
($2,759)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Fresno has a value of $1,897 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

31.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 31.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (37.6%), Fresno has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Fresno has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (31.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.5%).
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Fresno Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Fresno Overcrowded Households

10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 10.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.2%), Fresno has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Fresno has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

54.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 54.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 54.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Fresno has a value of 54.4%.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Fresno has a value of 54.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Fresno Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Fresno Severe Housing Problems

26.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (25.7%), Fresno has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Fresno has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.3%).
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Households Above the Federal Poverty Level and Below the Real Cost Measure

22.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 22.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (24.0%), Fresno has a value of 22.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Fresno Households Below the Real Cost Measure

Current Value:
38.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 38.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (34.0%), Fresno has a value of 38.0% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(34.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.

County: Fresno Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

54.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 54.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (57.0%), Fresno has a value of 54.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (54.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.0%).
Prior Value
(48.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

27.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 27.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.0%), Fresno has a value of 27.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (27.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Fresno Income Inequality

0.473
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 0.473 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.461 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.481.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 0.473 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (0.490), Fresno has a value of 0.473 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.490)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Fresno has a value of 0.473 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Fresno Median Household Income

$67,756
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of $67,756 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $76,148 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $63,996.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of $67,756 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($91,905), Fresno has a value of $67,756 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($91,905)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Fresno has a value of $67,756 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Fresno Per Capita Income

$30,130
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of $30,130 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $37,717 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $32,012.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of $30,130 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value ($45,591), Fresno has a value of $30,130 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
($45,591)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Fresno has a value of $30,130 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
27.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 27.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 27.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (15.6%), Fresno has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Fresno has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
15.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 15.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.5%), Fresno has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Fresno has a value of 15.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
18.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 18.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (12.0%), Fresno has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (18.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 14.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0%), Fresno has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Fresno has a value of 14.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
17,307
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
58.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 58.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 68.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 58.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (72.0%), Fresno has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Fresno has a value of 58.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
19.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 19.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (12.1%), Fresno has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(12.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Fresno has a value of 19.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Fresno Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (1.5%), Fresno has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Fresno has a value of 1.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Fresno Child Care Centers

5.4
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 5.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (8.1), Fresno has a value of 5.4 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Fresno has a value of 5.4 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (5.4) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3.7).
Prior Value
(3.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
23.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 23.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 19.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 23.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (35.9%), Fresno has a value of 23.4% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(35.9%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Fresno has a value of 23.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
78.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 78.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 78.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (84.4%), Fresno has a value of 78.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(84.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Fresno has a value of 78.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Fresno Student-to-Teacher Ratio

21.2
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 21.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 21.2 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (21.9), Fresno has a value of 21.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(21.9)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Fresno has a value of 21.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (21.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.2).
Prior Value
(21.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno 11th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

52.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 52.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (54.8%), Fresno has a value of 52.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (52.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.9%).
Prior Value
(48.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 11th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
21.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 21.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (27.0%), Fresno has a value of 21.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (21.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 3rd Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

37%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 37% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (42%), Fresno has a value of 37% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(42%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (37%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (24%).
Prior Value
(24%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 3rd Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
38%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 38% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 32%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Fresno has a value of 38% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (38%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (22%).
Prior Value
(22%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

38%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 38% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (44%), Fresno has a value of 38% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(44%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (38%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (27%).
Prior Value
(27%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 4th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
32%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 32% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (38%), Fresno has a value of 32% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(38%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (32%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (20%).
Prior Value
(20%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 5th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

41.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 41.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (47.1%), Fresno has a value of 41.5% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(47.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (41.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (35.0%).
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 5th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
25.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 25.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 20.0%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (31.6%), Fresno has a value of 25.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (25.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 6th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

42.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 42.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.1%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (45.1%), Fresno has a value of 42.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(45.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (42.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (34.1%).
Prior Value
(34.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 6th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
30.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 30.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 26.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 22.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.5%), Fresno has a value of 30.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (30.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (20.7%).
Prior Value
(20.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 7th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

46.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 46.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (49.2%), Fresno has a value of 46.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (46.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.9%).
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 7th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 27.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 28.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (32.0%), Fresno has a value of 27.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (27.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 8th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

42.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 42.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (46.6%), Fresno has a value of 42.6% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(46.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (42.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (38.5%).
Prior Value
(38.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno 8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
24.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 24.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 18.7%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2%), Fresno has a value of 24.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(29.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (24.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Fresno High School Graduation

83.2%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 83.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (86.2%), Fresno has a value of 83.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(86.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Fresno has a value of 83.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (83.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.0%).
Prior Value
(84.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Annual Ozone Air Quality

Current Value:

County: Fresno Annual Ozone Air Quality

5
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Fresno has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:

County: Fresno Annual Particle Pollution

5
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Fresno has a value of 5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
26,374
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (26,374) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17,454).
Prior Value
(17,454)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
84.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 84.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 84.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (94.2%), Fresno has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(94.2%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Fresno has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (84.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (84.3%).
Prior Value
(84.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Fresno Access to Parks

0.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 0.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (79.5%), Fresno has a value of 0.7% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(79.5%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (0.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.5%).
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Fresno Food Environment Index

7.4
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 7.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.4.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 7.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (8.6), Fresno has a value of 7.4 which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(8.6)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Fresno has a value of 7.4 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (7.4) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.3).
Prior Value
(7.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Fresno Liquor Store Density

9.9
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 9.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Fresno has a value of 9.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (11.0), Fresno has a value of 9.9 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Fresno has a value of 9.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (9.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.5).
Prior Value
(9.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Fresno Proximity to Highways

0.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (0.1%), Fresno has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (0.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Fresno PBT Released

435
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (435) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16).
Prior Value
(16)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Fresno Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:
4,837.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Fresno has a value of 4,837.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,532.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,680.5.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (4,541.0), Fresno has a value of 4,837.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(4,541.0)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (4,837.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (4,383.0).
Prior Value
(4,383.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Months of Mild Drought or Worse

Current Value:
7
Months per year
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (7) is less and better than the previously measured value (8).
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:
22
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (22) is less and better than the previously measured value (33).
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:
16
Events
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (16) is less and better than the previously measured value (29).
Prior Value
(29)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
5
Days
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (5) is less and better than the previously measured value (11).
Prior Value
(11)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Fresno Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
47
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Fresno (47) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (46).
Prior Value
(46)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Fresno value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.